SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.GOURI SHANKAR MURTHY, K.L.REKHI
Consolidated Coffee Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, Bombay – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Habibulla Badsha, K. Ilias Ali,T.H.K. Ghauri

ORDER

M. Gouri Shankar Murthy, Member (J)

1. The facts in so far material, in this appeal to the Central Board of Excise and Customs, transferred to be heard by the Tribunal as if it were an appeal before it pursuant to the provisions in S. 131-B(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 [hereinafter, the Act] are :

(a) after negotiation with the Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Company, (an Undertaking of the Maharashtra State Government) as well as 'their principal M/s. Gunsuns Sortex Ltd., (of Fairfield Road, London, England) the appellant purchased and imported six nos. Sortex Electronic Colour Seperators (ex. demonstration machines in good condition) conforming to Model 425 together with recommended spares. The Bill of Entry was filed on 7-1-1982, declaring, inter alia, their aggregate assessable value to be Rs. 7,80,029/- ;

(b) a notice dated 10-5-1982 was issued to the appellant, alleging misdeclaration of the value and absence of Import Licence cover and consequently commission of offences under Section 111 (d) and (m) of the Act, and requiring the appellant to show cause as to why the goods in question should not be confiscated under Section 111 and a penalty imposed on the appellant under Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top