SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.PRAKASH ANAND, G.P.AGARWAL
Premier Packaging (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K. Narasimhan,Shishir Kumar

ORDER

K. Prakash Anand, Member (T)

1. It is alleged in the present matter that appellants used 23,45,352 Kgs. of kraft paper for manufacture of kraft board during the period from April, 1972 to November, 1974 but accounted for only 15,14,438 Kgs. of kraft board. The Department, therefore,, charged appellants with manufacture, non-accountal and removal without payment of duty and without observing due procedure 5,01,544 Kgs. of kraft board.

2. Shri K. Narasimhan, Advocate appears, on behalf of the appellant. He submits that the period for which duty has been demanded is April, 1972 to November, 1974. The show cause notice was issued on 12th May, 1975. Thereafter what is described by the learned Advocate as a corrigendum, was issued by the Department on 10th February, 1977 which explained the basis of duty demanded in the show cause notice dated 12th May, 1975. According to the learned Advocate the first show cause notice issued on 12th May, 1975 was in fact incomplete and it is only with the issue of the subsequent notice of 10th February, 1977 that the show cause notice can be considered to have been finalised. Accordingly, limitation should count from the date of the corrigendum and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top