SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.L.REKHI, M.SANTHANAM
H. Guru Instruments (P) Ltd. Calcutta – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.M. Dass,A.K. Jain

ORDER

K.L. Rekhi, Member (T)

1. The appellants are aggrieved by the impugned orders in pursuance of which central excise duty amounting to Rs. 57,688.27 has been demanded from them on scientific and Industrial Instruments manufactured by them through M/s. India Electrodes and Components ('IEC' for short) and cleared unauthorisedly without payment of central excise duty. Penalty of Rs. 25,000/- has also been imposed on them.

2. We have heard both sides and have carefully considered their submissions and the record. The appellants pressed before us only the following two arguments:

(1) Since the appellants supplied only the raw materials and all manufacturing operations were performed by M/s. IEC, M/s. I.E.C. were the manufacturers and not the appellants; and

(2) the demand show cause 'notice issued on 24.2.1979 for the period 6.3.1975 to 17.1.1978 was time barred. As no allegation of fraud or suppression had been made in the show cause notice and hence the normal time limit of six months applied.

3. We find from the order-in-appeal that the appellants had taken the first plea before the Central Board of Excise and Customs also On this point, paragraph 6' of the Board's order-in-appeal rea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top