SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HARISH CHANDER, V.P.GULATI
Sundaram Fasteners Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Lakshmikumaran,A.S. Sundar Rajan

ORDER

V.P. Gulati, Member (T)

1. This is an appeal which was originally filed as a revision application before the Central Government and which on transfer to this Tribunal is being treated as if it were an appeal filed before the Tribunal to be disposed of accordingly.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants filed a refund claim in respect of duty paid on following item :-

xxx xxx xxx

The appellants claimed the assessment of these under item 68 GET but the classification list approved was for classification of these under Item 52 GET. However, later these were held to be assessable under Item 68 as against original assessment done under 52 GET. The appellants therefore filed a refund claim and claimed the benefit of the exemption notification No. 167/79. The refund claim was partially allowed after the issue of show cause notice to the appellants and taking into account the submissions made by them in this regard. The original authority allowed the refund notwithstanding the fact that appellants had not followed the Chapter X procedure as envisaged under notification No. 167/79 for the reason that the appellants could not have followed this procedure when the goods were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top