SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, V.T.RAGHAVACHARI
Collector of Central Excise, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Synthetic Cutting Tools Manufacturing Co. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C. Sachar,V. Lakshmikumaran

ORDER

V.T. Raghavachari, Member (J)

1. M/s. Synthetic Cutting Tools Manufacturing Company manufacture resin impregnated/coated discs of glass fabrics which are excisable under item 22-F of the First Schedule to the Central Excises Salt Act, 1944. The 'Assistant Collector under order dated 7.7.1979 held these discs liable for duty under tariff item No. 22F CET as they were not eligible for the exemption under notification No. 87/76-CE dated 16.3.1976. On Appeal the said order was set aside by the Appellate Collector under order dated 20.11.8.0. He held that the fabric continues to be the fabric even when cut into discs and as the entitlement of full exemption to the fabrics is not in dispute the discs were also entitled to the same exemption. The Central Government being of the view that the said order of the Appellate Collector was not proper, legal and correct, issued notice dated 14.5.81 under section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act calling upon the manufacturer to show cause why the order of the Appellate Collector should not be set aside and that of the Assistant Collector restored or any other order passed as may be deemed fit and proper. The Government was prima fac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top