SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.DUGGAL, D.C.MANDAL
Chowgule Matrix Hobs Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, Bombay – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B. Gujral,J. Gopinath

ORDER

S. Duggal, Member (J)

1. The dispute, which is the subject-matter of this appeal, arose when the appellants as importers filed a letter, dated 15.5.1978, before the Assistant Collector of Customs, Bombay, for assessment of the goods @ 25% of Customs duty under Notification No. 40/78-Cus., dated 1.3.1978 covered by Ex-Bonds Bill of Entry No. 635/303 of 25.5.1977 S.S. Vishva Ajay and Bill of Entry No. 185/15 of 22.4.1977 s.s. Rudolf. The plea for assessment at the concessional rate was disallowed by order dated 5.6.1978, on the ground that the imports had taken place under 'Project Import1 regulations, as contemplated by Tariff Item 84.65 of the Customs Tariff Act and, as such, the case being of a concessional import under a specific provision of the CTA; the importers were not further entitled to claim concession under a notification.

2. On an appeal being filed before the Appellate Collector, whereby the appellants had reiterated their claim for concessional assessment (9 25%, the Appellate Collector rejected the same on an altogether different ground; namely, that the import in this case having taken place before the issuance of Notification No. 40/78-Cus., the importers were n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top