K.L.REKHI, V.T.RAGHAVACHARI
Rajasthan Worsted Spinning Mills – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Jaipur – Respondent
K.L. Rekhi, Member (T)
1. The appellants filed a refund claim on 1-12-78, some 20 months after the payment of duty. The Assistant Collector rejected it on merits as well as on the ground of time bar (of 6 months) under the erstwhile Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The appellants received the Assistant Collector's order on 29-3-80. Under the then Section 35 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the appellants could file an appeal to the Appellate Collector within three months. The appellants, however, filed the appeal late on 25-9-80. The Appellate Collector rejected it as being out of time. Aggrieved by this order, the appellants filed a revision application before the Central Government which, on transfer to this Tribunal, is now before us as the subject appeal.
2. During the hearing before us, the appellants pressed for only one point : that their subject application to the Central Government was for revision of the Assistant Collector's order and not for revision of the Appellate Collector's order. They stated that under Section 36(1) of the Act, revision before the Central Government could be filed against any decision or order passed under the Act or the Rul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.