Back
H.R.SYIEM, M.SANTHANAM
Sarang Spring Manufacturing Company – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Baroda – Respondent
H.R. Syiem, Member (T)
1. Before the appeals were taken up, the Bench heard the application for condonation of delay in filing appeal No. 1546/86-B1. Considering that this was only a supplementary appeal that arose from the fact that the Appellate Collector passed one order in respect of two orders in original, the Bench condoned the delay and commenced the hearing of the two appeals.
2. The appellants were correct when they said in their revision petition dated 12.10.1981 that the Appellate Collector entered into the aspect of classification which was not a dispute before him for determination. The only dispute was whether end-use certificates were necessary for the purpose of notification No. 99/71-CE.
3. By his order in appeal No. 524/BD-21/81 and 525/BD-22/81 dated 25th April, 1981 the Appellate Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) rejected preferential assessment under notification No. 99/71-CE, because he said the springs were not classifiable under tariff item 34A. It was only those springs classifiable under tariff item 34A used as parts and accessories of motor vehicles which would be exempted from payment of duty under the notification.
4. The manufacturers, M/s. Sarang
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
