SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, V.T.RAGHAVACHARI
Collector of Central Excise, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Voltas Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.V. Naik,A.N. Haksar

ORDER

V.T. Raghavachari, Member (J)

1. M/s. Voltas Limited manufacture, amongst other things, diesel and battery operated fork lift trucks, falling under tariff item 34-B C.E.T. In the price list filed by them in proforma part V, which is meant for excisable goods for sale in retail, they claimed deduction of selling and administrative expenses and interest on working capital. The deduction claimed was at 9.66% for diesel fork lift trucks and 10.49% for battery operated fork lift trucks. The Assistant Collector in approving the price list held that the deduction claimed under the above heads was not covered by the provisions of Rule 6(a) of the Valuation Rules and was hence not admissible. He, however, held that he was permitting deduction to the extent of 7.5% on the retail prices declared. The assessee appealed and the Appellate Collector, under order dated 12.8.1976, set aside the order of the Assistant Collector on the ground that it was not a speaking order and that no opportunity had been given to the assessee to make representations before the Assistant Collector passed the order. He remitted the matter to the Assistant Collector for de-novo proceeding and passing a speaking a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top