SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.KALYANAM, D.C.MANDAL
Agarwal Brose. Steel Rolling Mills – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Srinivasan,K.M. Vadivelu

ORDER

S. Kalyanam, Member (J)

1. Shri S.K. Srinivasan, the Liaison Officer of the appellant-company appearing on behalf of the appellant-company submitted that out of the total tax of Rs. 57,358.71, the appellant has already deposited a sum of Rs. 28,679.36. In respect of the balance, it was urged that the appellant unit is a small scale industry and finished products worth about Rs. 63,000/- is already in the custody of the Central Excise Department and the industry itself remained closed for the past two years. Since the appeal itself is posted today and since 50 per cent of the duty has already been deposited, in the circumstances, we dispense with the prior deposit of the duty amount pending disposal of the appeal today.

This appeal is directed against the Order of Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Madras, dated 11-1-1985 confirming the order of the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore dated 27-8-1984 raising a demand on the appellant for a sum of Rs. 57,358.71 as duty amount due in respect of the appellant's clearances effected between June 1980 to August 1982 for the manufacture of excisable goods such as re-rolled iron and steel products. The short question tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top