K.L.REKHI, V.T.RAGHAVACHARI, D.C.MANDAL
Calico Mills – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad – Respondent
1. The point of dispute in this case is whether spindle tapes of width 15 cms. or less were liable to central excise duty in terms of the proviso to Exemption Notification No. 226/77-C.E., dated 15-7-1977. Appellants are not present at the time of hearing today. By their letter dated 18-6-1985 they have requested that the matter may be decided on merits in their absence. They have sent certain written submissions which we have considered. We have also heard learned Representative of the Department. His prayer is that the matter may be remanded to the lower authority to deal with the appellants' new contention that duty demanded from them was fabric duty and not yarn duty. In response to our query, he confirmed that according to the record the other two exemption Notification No. 70/69-C.E., dated 1-3-1969, No. 91/69-C.E., dated 1-3-1969 were in force during the material period.
2. We have carefully considered the matter. The exemption Notification No. 70/69-C.E. and 91/69-C.E., both dated 1-3-1969 gave total exemption to cotton fabrics of not more than 15 cms. in width, so far as the duty liable under item 19 of the Central Excise Tariff is concerned. Exemption Notification No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.