SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, S.C.JAIN, K.PRAKASH ANAND
Muthuvel Industries – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.P. Jagadeesan,V. Zutshi

ORDER

S.C. Jain, Member (J)

1. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that M/s. Muthuvel Industries (hereinafter called the appellants) manufacture, amongst other things, office files using tag or slip, lever arch files, fibre board files with the brand and description printed on the front page. The appellants claimed that the printed office files were products of printing industry attracting exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 55/75-C.E. dated 1st March, 1975 (as amended). The concerned Assistant Collector rejected the claim of the appellants.

2. Aggrieved, the appellants filed an appeal before the Appellate Collector, Central Excise, Madras who by his Order-in-Appeal No. 2085/80 dated 20-11-1980 under C. No. V/68/31/80 also rejected the appeal filed by the appellants holding that files manufactured by the appellants fall under item 68 and are liable to duty. He observed as under :

".... The question whether these constitute products of the printing industry depends on the facts whether in respect of these products printing virtually constitutes the culminating process of manufacture for obtaining the end product. Obviously, this is not the case in respect of files in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top