CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND GOLD (CONTROL) APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI
G. Sankaran, Harish Chander, K. Prakash Anand, JJ.
Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. -Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Patna -Respondent
Order No. C-666/85, C-666 of 1985
Decided On : 25-09-1985
Ravinder Narain,V. Lakshmi Kumaran
1. M/s. Tata Iron
2. Briefly the facts of the case are that M/s. Tata Iron
(a) There was no contravention on their part part of any provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 or the rules made thereunder as alleged in the above show cause notice.
(b) Coke oven gas is released during the course of carbonisation of coal while manufacturing coke. Coke oven gas was always declared by the Company in the classification list as "Particulars of other goods produced or manufactured and intended to be removed by the assessee". Therefore, the goods in question had not been removed without the knowledge of the excise authorities. In 1975, when T.I. 68 was introduced, while submitting the classification list, they continued to describe this item under "Particulars of other goods produced or manufactured and intended to be removed by the assessee."
(c) Coke oven gas comes out during the course of carbonisation of coal. No electric power is used in the process of carbonisation. Therefore, this product is exempt from payment of duty as "Manufactured without the aid of power" under Notification No. 179/77, dated 18-6-1977, read with Notification No. 105/76, dated 16-3-1976.
(d) There is no contravention of Rule 173B inasmuch as the Company had already declared coke oven gas in the classification list as stated above.
(e) The demand in this case is barred by limitation under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, inasmuch as the demand has been raised after a lapse of six months from the date of cause of action. The proviso to this section is not attracted in the absence of any intention what-so-ever on their part to contravene any provision of law, If the company is compelled to pay duty for the past period, they would suffer irreparable loss because they would not be in a position to recover the duty