SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, S.C.JAIN, V.T.RAGHAVACHARI
Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.R. Mehta,V. Zutshi

ORDER

V.T. Raghavachari, Member (J)

1. The appellants M/s. Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd. received notice dated 22-8-1980 calling upon them to show cause why an amount of Rs. 1,810.51 should not be recovered from them as Special Excise Duty payable for their clearances during 6-8-1980 to 15-8-1980 of house-hold and laundry soaps and why penalty also should not be levied for contravention of Rules 173F and 173G(1) of Central Excise Rules.

2. The ground mentioned in the notice was that the appellants cleared the goods without payment of Basic Excise Duty by virtue of benefit under Notification No. 201/79 and claimed that they were, therefore, not liable for Special Excise Duty also but that they were not correct in taking up such a position. The appellants sent their reply.

3. After adjudication, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta under his order dated 21-11-1980 rejected the contentions of the appellants and confirmed the demand for payment of Special Excise Duty mentioned earlier and further imposed a penalty of Rs. 500/-. The appeal against the said order was rejected by the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta under his order dated 6-3-1982. The revision petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top