SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

D.N.LAL, M.SANTHANAM, M.GOURI SHANKAR MURTHY
Food Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.N. Mehta,Mahesh Kumar

ORDER

M. Santhanam, Member (J)

1. The allegations, in so far material, in this Revision Application to the Government of India, transferred to and heard by the Tribunal as an Appeal pursuant to the provisions in Section 131B of the Customs Act, 1962 (the Act, for short) are-

(a) at the time of filing the Bill of Entry on or about 28-9-1976, the value of the cargo (18698.0439 M/tons of urea) was declared on the basis of the fixture notice;

(b) subsequently, however, it was noticed that as per the invoice, the C F price paid was-(i) US $ 119 M.T. for 3902 M/Tons, and (ii) US $ 123 M.T. for 14976.0439 M/Tons, and not US $ 199 M.T. for the whole quantity as erroneously declared in the B/E and forming the basis for the assessment to duty;

(c) this apart, the stevedoring charges at Rs. 16 per M.T. were included in the assessable value, notwithstanding that the work of stevedoring was got done departmentally incurring an expenditure of Rs. 1,31,705.30;

(d) accordingly, an application for refund dated 21-3-1977 was preferred;

(e) in adjudication, the claim was rejected on the grounds that-

(i) there could not have been two prices or assessable values in respect of one consignment covered by a si

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top