SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, K.L.REKHI, HARISH CHANDER
Collector of Central Excise, Aurangabad – Appellant
Versus
Niphad Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dolly Sexana,B.D. Deshmukh

ORDER

K.L. Rekhi, Member (T)

1. The dispute in this case is on the method of calculation of average production of sugar for the purpose of grant of the Central Excise Duty Concession (commonly called incentive rebate for higher production) in terms of the exemption notification No. 132/82-C.E., dated 21-4-1982. In order to facilitate the understanding of the controversy, we reproduce this notification below :-

"In exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-rule (1) of rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, read with Sub-section (4) of Section 50 of the Finance Act, 1982 (14 of 1982), the Central Government hereby exempts sugar, described in column (1) of the Table below and falling under sub-item (1) of Item No. 1 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), from so much of the duty of excise and special duty of excise leviable thereon as is specified in the corresponding entry in columns (2) and (3) of the said Table.

xxx xxx xxx

Provided that the amount of exemption specified in column (2) or column (3) of the said Table shall not exceed the amount of duty of excise payable on free sale sugar or levy sugar, as the case may be.

Explanation :-In this notif

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top