SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.SANKARAN, HARISH CHANDER, K.PRAKASH ANAND
Indye Chemicals – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Ahmedabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.J. Trivedi,B.R. Tripathi

ORDER

K. Prakash Anand, Member (T)

1. Appeal No. 377/82 is a Revision Application, filed before the Government of India, against Order-in-Appeal No. A-1195/BD-493/82 dated 17th August, 1982, passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay. After the constitution of this Tribunal, it has been transferred here and is now being treated as an Appeal before us. The Tribunal has also received and registered Appeal No. 288/83 against the same order. Both matters are being disposed of by this common order.

2. Briefly, the facts are that the appellants are manufacturers of Synthetic Organic Dyestuff, falling under Central Excise Tariff Item No. 14-D. Under Notification No. 180/61-CE dated 23-11-1961, rapidogens, falling under Item No.14D-CET, are exempted from whole of duty of excise leviable thereon, if such rapidogens are manufactured from other dyes on which Excise Duty or Countervailing Customs Duty, as the case may be, has already been paid. The petitioners filed a classification list under Rule 173-B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, claiming the exemption under this Notification. This was considered and duly approved by the department. Separately, the Government issued anot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top