SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

C.T.A.PILLAI, S.KALYANAM
Hindustan Teleprinters Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Jagadesan,V. Ramachandran

ORDER

C.T.A. Pillai, Member (T)

1. In his order referred to supra, the Collector of Customs, Madras, found that a consignment declared to contain electric typewriters, component parts of electric typewriter in semi-knocked down condition was not covered by Licence No. P/D/2227424 dated 1-9-1982 as the goods were in effect complete typewriters, the import of which is not permitted during the Policy period April-March 1982-83 in terms of Sl. No. 77 of Appendix 4. He also noted that there were excess goods of the value of Rs. 13,968/- not declared in the Bill of Entry. He ordered the confiscation of both the typewriters and the excess items less key tops (the latter valued at Rs. 13,968/-) under Section 111(d) and (m) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 3(2) of the Import and Export (Control) Act, 1962 and fixed a fine in lieu of confiscation of Rs. 2 lakhs. In coming to this conclusion the Collector noted that the licence presented was for the importation of "components of electric typewriters in S.K.D. condition according to the lists attached". The goods were not components in S.K.D. condition but mere complete typewriters without side covers, back cover, bottom cover, top cov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top