G.SANKARAN, D.N.LAL, S.C.JAIN
Bhor Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Bombay – Respondent
G. Sankaran, Member (T)
1. The captioned appeal was initially filed as a Revision Application before the Central Government which, under Section 35-P of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, has come as transferred proceedings to this Tribunal, for disposal as if it were an appeal filed before it.
2. The facts of the case, briefly stated, are that M/s. Bhor Industries, Bombay (hereinafter referred to as Bhor for brevity's sake) filed a classification list No. XIV/75, dated 20-11-1975 for the product PVC films for lamination with jute and PVC films for tapes claiming that the PVC film was non-excisable on the ground it was a non-marketable intermediate product for internal use. This description was further amended to crude PVC films/sheets. The classification list was approved on 9-12-1975 by the Assistant Collector, Central Excise. Later on, on 15-2-1977, the Assistant Collector issued a show cause notice to Bhor calling upon them to show cause why the aforesaid films should not be reclassified as excisable under Item No. 15A(2) of the Central Excise Tariff Schedule and why duty should not be recovered from them thereafter as well as in respect of past clearances. The notice i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.