SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.B.GUJRAL, S.D.JHA, M.SANTHANAM
Madan Cold Storage – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L. Beri,V. Lakshmikumaran

ORDER

M. Santhanam, Member (J)

1. The appeal against the orders of the Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur in his Order-in-Original No. 10/Collr/MP/78 dated 18-2-1978.

2. The appellants are owners of a Cold Storage in Kanpur. In 1975, they found that some of their bunker type cooling coils and their condensers needed to be replaced. These parts were to be made indigenously. The appellants purchased some pipes from the market and improvisedly made this item by arranging the pipes and connected them with U shape bends and fitted them in their cold storage. The appellants urged that such items are not liable to Central Excise duty. In May, 1975 some of the officers of the Central Excise Preventive Branch, Kanpur paid a surprise visit to their cold storage premises and conducted a survey of the plant. The department alleged that the appellants had not taken out a Central Excise licence for the manufacture of these items and these parts have been utilised without filing their classification list. The goods were seized for contraventions of Rules 9(1), 52-A, 52, 173G(4) and 173Q read with Rule 226 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

2A. A show cause notice followed. The adjudicating Officer o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top