SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.B.GUJRAL, G.SANKARAN, S.D.JHA
Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, Bombay – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Subramanian,N.V. Raghvan Iyer

ORDER

1. The Appellant firm imported a consignment of what was described in the covering invoice as "Pole-end-plate forgings-Rough machined pole and plate forgings for generator parts Drg. No. 3-68-0006 through the port of Bombay. The Customs authorities classified the goods under heading No. 73.33/40 which read at the material time as follows :-

"73.33/40-other articles of iron or steel"

The appellants cleared the goods on payment of customs duty so assessed at 60% ad valorem (Basic Customs duty) plus 15% ad valorem (Auxiliary Customs duty). Later on, they filed a refunded claim before the Assistant Collector of Customs seeking re-assessment of the goods under Customs Notification No. 182/78 on the ground that the subject goods were required as parts for the assembly or manufacture of synchronous condenser of rating 30 MVAR.' The A.C. rejected the claim as unsubstantiated on the ground that the documentary evidence asked for by him was not produced by the Appellants. Against this order the appellants preferred an appeal which the, Appellate Collector of Customs rejected on the ground that the imported items were not finished items and therefore they could not be deemed as parts withi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top