SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.B.GUJRAL, D.N.LAL, RAMA DEVI
Shree Rayalaseema Paper Mills Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.M. Kaul,Mahesh Kumar

ORDER

1. The present appeal dated 8-12-1979 as supplemented by a further communication dated 20-2-80 (originally filed as a revision application before Government and transferred to this Tribunal under Section 35-P of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944) has been filed by M/s. Shree Rayalaseema Paper Mills Ltd., Kurnool, who are engaged in the manufacture of varieties of paper including wrapping paper. The facts of the case are not in dispute but for a proper appreciation of the legal issues which flow from such facts, the same are briefly set out as hereunder :

2. When the appellants started production in their paper mill in April, 1979, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Kurnool vide his order dated 21-4-79 informed them that excise duty should be paid by them-(a) on wrapping paper produced by them prior to its use as wrapper for wrapping other varieties of paper, and (b) the value of such wrapping paper (including the duty element) should be added to the value of any other type of paper before the assessable value of such paper is determined. In other words, the Assistant Collector wanted the appellants to pay the central excise duty on the wrapping paper at two stages,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top