Back
S.VENKATESAN, S.DUGGAL, K.L.REKHI
General Industrial Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Calcutta – Respondent
S. Duggal, Member (J)
1. The proceedings in this case emanated from a notice to show cause bearing date 29-7-1976, having been issued by Superintendent, Central Excise, Chandernagore I Range (Annexure 'B') whereby the appellant company was called upon to show cause as to why central excise duty was not payable at all the three stages of manufacture of yarn, produced at their factory, namely, (i) cotton yarn (ii) staple yarn and (iii) the process of twisting or doubling these two yarns into a multiple fold yarn.
2. The facts, as revealed by the show cause notice, indicate that the appellant viz. a Company under name and style M/s. The General Industrial Society Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Appellant), manufactured separately cotton yarn of tariff item 18A, and staple yarn falling under Tariff entry 18, and used these two yarns as constituents, to produce a multiple-fold yarn, by the processing of doubling and twisting. During the period from October, 1975 to June, 1976, the appellant cleared this final product, by paying duty at the 3rd stage by treating it to be: "yarn, all sorts, not elsewhere specified", as contemplated by entry 18E of the Central Excise Tariff, as
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
