SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.B.GUJRAL, K.L.REKHI, V.S.RAMA DEVI
Sundaram-Clayton Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, Madras – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K. Jain

ORDER

1. The case came up for hearing today.

2. The appellants, instead of appearing personally, have sent a telegram requesting that their appeal may be decided on merits. On going through the records, we find that the appellants imported guide plates which are a part of pressure reducer valve used in the air-brake system of commercial vehicles. These were assessed to customs duty under heading 87.04/06 of the Tariff as parts and accessories of motor vehicles. The appellants seek their re-assessment under heading 84.61(2) as parts of pressure reducing valves. The Department's objection to their request is that heading 84.61 covers 'Taps, cocks, valves and similar appliances for pipes, boiler shells, tanks, vats and the like, including pressure reducing valves and thermostatically controlled valves:" which means valves for use on stationary appliances and machines while the subject goods were parts of valves of motor vehicles. On careful consideration of the matter, we agree with the Department's point and hold that the goods were correctly assessed under heading 87.04/06 as parts of motor vehicles. Accordingly, we reject this appeal.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top