SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.VENKATESAN, S.DUGGAL, K.L.REKHI
Sunrise Electric Corpn. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, Bombay – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.C. Sogani,K. Chandramouli

ORDER

S. Venkatesan, Sr. Vice-President

1. This is a revision application (hereinafter called "appeal") filed before the Central Government which under Section 131B of the Customs Act, 1962, stands transferred to this Tribunal to be disposed of as if it were an appeal presented before the Tribunal.

2. The goods in this case are what the appellants have described as "E class electrical grade insulating papers". They were classified by the Customs authorities under Heading No. 39.01/06, relating to artificial resins and plastic materials, etc. The appellants claimed reassessment under Heading No. 48.01/21, relating to paper and paper-board and articles thereof. Their claim was rejected by the Assistant Collector, who held that the assessment under Heading No. 39.01/06 was in order. Their appeal to the Appellate Collector was rejected for reasons which will be mentioned later. Against this order of rejection the appellants filed a revision application which now stands transferred to the Tribunal.

3. Appearing for the appellants, Shri Sogani argued the case in great detail. Before setting out his arguments, it would be useful to take note of two previous orders of the Tribunal.

4. In its or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top