Back
S.VENKATESAN, S.DUGGAL, S.D.JHA
Ceakay Rubber Industries – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent
S. Duggal, Member (J) and S. Venkatesan, Senior Vice-President.
1. M/s. Ceakay Rubber Industries stated to be a partnership concern doing business of manufacture of rubber products within the jurisdiction of Changanacherry Range, Kottayam Division in Cochin Collectorate (Kerala), had filed this revision petition before the Central Government under provisions of Section 36 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The same has been received by the Tribunal as an appeal by virtue of Section 35 P of the said Act, and is being disposed of as such.
2. The appeal is directed against order passed by the Appellate Collector, Customs and Central Excise, Madras on 11-2-1980 whereby he confirmed the order passed by the Assistant Collector, Kottayam Range on 3-7-1978 confirming demand of duty amounting to Rs. 1,42,230.02 against the appellant being excise duty for the period 1-2-1970 to 13-10-1972 in relation to the product described as 'Cushion Compound'. This was pursuant to a notice to show cause having been issued on 28-8-1974 by the Range Officer concerned and after the party had filed reply, and after consideration of ail the contentions, the Assi
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
