SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.K.USHA, C.N.B.NAIR
Ram Khazana Electronic – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, Air Cargo, Jaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.P. Asthana,Kumar Santosh

ORDER

Per Justice K.K. Usha : The challenge in this appeal at the instance of the importer is against the order passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Jodhpur dated 3.9.2002. Under the above order the Commissioner had enhanced the assessable value of the goods imported under Bills of Entry dated 14.8.96 and 27.8.96. A duty demand amounting to Rs. 1,57,511/- was made under the first proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 in addition to the duty already paid by the party. Further an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- was ordered as redemption fine and a penalty of Rs. 1,57,511/- was imposed on the importer under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962. Thereafter, an amount of Rs. 40,000/- each was imposed on the two partners under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. It was also held that the importer is liable to pay interest under Section 28AB of the Customs Act. Aggrieved by the above, the importer has come up in appeal.

2. The main contentions raised are-

(1) the adjudicating authority has erred in enhancing the assessable value on the basis of the declaration alleged to have been filed by the foreign supplier of the goods with the Customs & Excise Department. Hon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top