SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KRISHNA KUMAR, C.SATAPATHY
Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Padma Nutrients Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ishwar Singh,S.N. Kantawala

ORDER

Per C. Satapathy : These four appeals have been filed by Revenue against a common Order-in-Original passed by Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai. Shri Ishwar Singh, learned J.D.R. appearing for Revenue states that the impugned order has been reviewed by the Central Board of Excise and Customs under its Order No. 150-R/97 Dtd. 30/06/1997. The departmental appeal has been filed as per the Board's finding that the impugned order passed by the Commissioner is not proper and legal for the reasons set out in Paragraph 9A to F of the said Order of Review. The learned J.D.R. reiterates the said reasons as also the grounds of appeal contained in the departmental appeal. He, further, emphasises the following:-

(1) The Commissioner should have appreciated that the provisional assessment was done not on account of applicability of Notification No. 203/92 dtd. 19/05/1992 but on the ground of chemical test of the goods.

(2) The Commissioner was wrong in applying the principle of comity of courts is holding D.R.I action as without authority of law, D.R.I. officials have been empowered with the powers of officers of Customs under the Notification No. 19/90 dtd. 26/04/1990 and they were fully com

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top