SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.AGRAWAL, P.G.CHACKO
S. S. Bedi & Sons – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi-I – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.C. Kamra,Jagdish Singh

ORDER

Per V.K. Agrawal :

In this appeal, filed by M/s. S.S. Bedi Sons, the issue involved is whether Central Excise duty is payable on Lay Flat Tubing.

2. Shri S.C. Kamra, learned Advocate, submitted that the Appellants manufacture poly-bags which are exempted from payment of duty under Notification No. 4/97-CE dated 1.3.97; that they obtained Lay Flat Tubing as an intermediate product in the manufacture of poly-bags from plastic granules; that the impugned goods were exempted from payment of excise duty right from 1994-95 till today except for the financial year 1997-98; that the Additional Commissioner under the Adjudication Order No. 170/99 dated 7.10.99 has demanded the duty in respect of Lay Flat Tubing cleared during the period from 1.4.97 to 31.12.97 and imposed penalty of Rs. 50,966/- equivalent to the amount of duty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act; that the Commissioner (Appeals) under the impugned Order has confirmed the demand and the penalty. He, further, submitted that the entire demand is time barred as the show cause notice was issued on 7.4.99 i.e. beyond the normal time limit of 6 months; that there was n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top