SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.K.USHA, C.N.B.NAIR
Ferodo India (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Parthasarthy,P.K. Jain

ORDER

Per C.N.B. Nair:

The appellant M/s. Ferodo India (Pvt.) Limited is a subsidiary of M/s. TN International Ltd., U.K. from August 1998. Prior to that appellant was a joint venture with 51% share holding by the same M/s. TN International Ltd., U.K. Thus, the appellant has always been a related person of M/s. TN International Ltd., U.K.

2. The present appeal is directed against impugned orders which held that in respect of imports of capital goods, spares and accessories thereof, and raw materials by the appellant from their related persons namely TN International and its associates and subsidiaries, addition @ 17% is required to be made to the sale price of the goods in consideration of royalty and technical know how fees payable by the appellant to M/s. TN International. The above addition has been ordered in view of the provisions contained in Rule 9 (1) (c) of Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. During the hearing of the case, learned SDR pointed out that the addition would be justifiable in terms of Rule 9 (1) (e) also as indirect considerations also have to be taken into account while assessing goods to duty.

3. The legal provision being pressed into service by the Customs auth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top