S.L.PEERAN, LAJJA RAM
Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
Turnbull Control System (I) Ltd. – Respondent
Per S.L. Peeran :
This is a Revenue appeal arises from the Order-in-Appeal No. 39/94 dated 31.1.94 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) held that the appellants are entitled to the benefit of Notification 175/86. He further held that they were applying a sticker indicating the name of their company "Turnbull Control Systems (India) Ltd. - made in India" and had obtained permanent certificate registering their company from the Department of Industries & Commerce, Government of Tamil Nadu and has also registered as SSI. The Commissioner noted that affixing the label of the company does not bring within the ambit of the definition of `brand name' or `trade name' and the item is not traded in the name of the company and hence, he upheld their contention for grant of benefit of Notification No. 175/86. The Revenue contends that affixing a label "Turnbull Control Systems (I) Ltd. - made in India" would make the Respondents ineligible for the benefit of the Notification. Inscription of "Turnbull Control Systems (I) Ltd." would bring within the ambit of `brand name' or `trade name', hence the benefit of the Notification should be denied.
2. Heard learned DR Shri S. Kannan, who submits th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.