SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

LAJJA RAM, P.S.BAJAJ
Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur – Appellant
Versus
Maiden Trading Trading Co. (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.D. Singh,M.P. Devnath

ORDER

Per P.S. Bajaj:

This appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the impugned order in appeal dt. 15.11.2000 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) vide which he had reversed the order in original dt. 27.6.2000 of the Dy. Commissioner and allowed the benefit of Notifications Nos. 5/98-CE dt. 2.6.98 and 5/99-CE dt. 28.2.99, to the respondents.

2. The facts giving rise to this appeal may briefly be stated as under;

3. The respondents an 100% EOU, were engaged in the manufacture of recycled LDPE plastic granules and recycled LDPE Plastic Agglomerates falling under sub-heading 3901.10 of the CETA. They had been clearing the goods manufactured by them into Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) against payment in foreign exchange in terms of para 9.10(6) of EXIM Policy 1997-2002. The said clearances were effected by them without payment of additional duty of customs (CVD) by claiming exemption therefrom in terms of Notification Nos. 5/98-CE dt. 2.6.98 and 5/99-CE dt. 28.2.99. But they were in fact not eligible to avail the benefit of these notifications being not applicable to the clearances effected by the 100% EOU. Accordingly, two show cause notices, one dt. 20.7.99 for the period 20.1.99 to 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top