SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.S.BAJAJ, K.K.BHATIA
Jyoti Carpet Indus. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, jaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Swaminathan,Ravinder Babu

ORDER

Per K.K. Bhatia:

The Central Excise Officers of Headquarters (Anti-Evasion), Commissionerate, Jaipur-I, visited the factory of the appellants on 9 11.9.1998. They found that the appellants were engaged in the manufacture of car matting/other mattings. They has neither obtained any registration from the Central Excise Department nor had been paying central excise duty on removal of their final product. Certain documents/records were resumed from heir premises for further scrutiny From the scrutiny of these records, it was learnt that they were clearing their final products viz. car mattings or floor foot mats of the cars and accordingly it was observed that during the period 1995-96 to 1998-99, they has cleared finished goods valued at Rs 78,79,908.75 without payment of duty of central excise amounting to Rs 21,95,458.77 as per the particulars given below -

YearValue
1995-96Rs23,73,893
1996-97Rs 26,46,114
1997-98Rs 22,00.267
1998-99Rs 6,59,635

In this connection, the statement of Smt. Jyotsna Sharma, Proprietress of the party, was recorded on 11.9.1998 and 17.9.1998. in her statements, she deposed that they were manufacturing car mattings since 20.8.1995 with the raw material re. no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top