SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, V.K.AGRAWAL
National Radio & Electronics Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Aurangabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rohan Shah,Ashok Kumar

ORDER

Per Jyoti Balasundaram :

The appellants herein are engaged in the manufacture of automatic data processing machines and computer peripherals and parts thereof. With the introduction of the CETA 1985, w.e.f. 1.3.86, they had been classifying computer peripherals under Heading 84.71 and seeking exemption under Notification 64/86 dated 10.2.86. For the period in dispute viz. 8.3.86 to 28.2.87, they filed a classification list No. 1/86-87 w.e.f. 1.3.86. They filed a classification list No. 1/86-87 in which they classified computers and peripherals under Heading 84.71 and claimed exemption from basic duty in terms of Notification 64/86 and exemption from special excise duty under Notification 171/86 and 175/86. They also furnished a complete list of entire range of peripherals manufactured by them, as annexure to the classification list which was approved on 30.5.86. A show cause notice dated 25.2.91 was issued to the assessees proposing recovery of Rs. 56,61,926/- on the ground that computer peripherals fell for classification under Heading 84.73 and were not entitled to the benefit of exemption under Notification 64/86 since this Heading was not specified in the Notification. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top