SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.S.KANG, V.K.AGRAWAL
MX Software Services Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Parthasarathy,S. Ramanathan

ORDER

Per V.K. Agrawal :

The issue involved in this appeal filed by M/s. MX Software Pvt. Ltd. is whether the Xerox document Centre DCS 230ST is classifiable as a printer under sub Heading 8471.60 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act as claimed by them or under sub Heading 8479.89 as confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order dt. 28.8.98.

2. Shri R. Parthasarathy, Ld. Advocate, submitted that the impugned goods is a Digital Laser Printer with a Scanner mounted on the top of the Print engine and an inbuilt modem for fax transmission/reception; that the impugned product is a multifunction product; that the digital printing is the principal function and as per Note 3 to Section XVI of the Customs Tariff it is classifiable under Sub Heading 8471.60. The Ld. Counsel, further, submitted that as the Laser Printer is for automatic data processing machine it is specifically covered under Heading 84.71; that Note 5B to Chapter 84 is not applicable to the present matter; that Note 5B is applicable only for the purpose of determining when a unit may form part of an automatic data processing system and the said note is not applicable for classifying separately present

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top