SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, V.K.AGRAWAL, P.G.CHACKO
Vikram Ispat – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.S. Lodha, V. Sridharan, Shivdas, M.P. Devnath,R.D. Negi, M.M. Dubey

ORDER

Per V.K. Agrawal :

In these appeals filed by M/s. Vikram Ispat (A Unit of M/s. Grasim Industries Ltd.) and M/s. Kundalia Industries, references have been made to the Larger Bench on the question of quantum of Modvat credit of the duty paid on inputs available to them under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules read with Notification No. 5/94-CE, dated 1.3.1994.

2. Briefly stated the facts are that M/s. Vikram Ispat manufacture H.P. sponge Iron and avail of Modvat credit of the duty paid on inputs under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules. One of the inputs is Iron Ore Pellets which is either imported, procured from domestic manufacturer or procured from 100% Export Oriented Undertakings (100% E.O.U.). Notification No. 2/95-CE, dated 4.1.1995 provides the effective rate of duty of excise on goods manufactured in a 100% E.O.U. and cleared to the Domestic Tariff Area (D.T.A.). According to Notification the duty payable under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act will be 50% of each of the duties of Customs leviable under Section 12 of the Customs Act read with any other notification for the time being in force provided that the amount of duty payable shall not be less than the duty o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top