S.S.KANG, V.K.AGRAWAL
Aryan Exporters (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Allahabad – Respondent
Per S.S. Kang :
Appellants have filed this Appeal against order in appeal passed by the Collector (Appeals).
2. Heard both sides.
3. Brief facts of the case are that the Appellants are engaged in the manufacture of articles of unhardened Vulcanised Rubber and claimed classification under Chapter heading 40 of the C.E.T.A. The classification was approved. The Revenue Appealed before the Collector of Customs and Excise and vide the impugned order the Collector of Customs and Excise (Appeals) accepted the contention of the Revenue and held that the goods manufactured by the Appellants are classifiable under heading 86.07 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. Aggrieved by this order the Appellants filed this appeal. The contention of the appellants is that before the Collector (Appeals) the Appellants pleaded that in the case of M/s. Avadh Rubber the same goods were held to be classifiable under Chapter Heading 4016.19 of the C.E.T.A. But their contention was rejected on the ground that the Revenue had filed appeal before C.E.G.A.T. against the decision in the case of M/s. Avadh Rubber. The Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellants also submitted that the Tribunal in the case of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.