SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, C.N.B.NAIR
Vishal Footwear Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.M. Sharma,R.S. Sangia

ORDER

Per Jyoti Balasundaram :

In this case, the Customs duty demand of Rs. 80,65,374/- has been confirmed against M/s. Vishal Footwear for contravention of the provisions of Notification No. 339/85-Cus dated 21.11.85 as amended and Notification No. 133/94-Cus dated 22.6.95, Central Excise duty of Rs. 1,13,394/- has been confirmed in terms of Notification No. 5/86-CE dated 20.1.86, penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs has been imposed on M/s. Vishal Footwear under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, penalty of Rs. 20,000/- under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 has been imposed; further a penalty of Rs. 25,000/- has been imposed on the Managing Director of the company under the provisions of Customs Act and penalty of Rs. 5,000/- under the provisions of Central Excise Act. Imported goods valid at Rs. 2,18,98,263/- have been ordered to be confiscated under Section 111 (o) of the Customs Act, 1962 with option to redeem the same on payment of a fine of Rs. 12 lakhs.

2. The brief facts of the case are that M/s. Vishal Footwear which was a unit in the NOIDA Export Processing Zone, approved for manufacture and export of leather footwear, was allowed to import capital goods and raw materials

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top