SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.AGRAWAL, JYOTI BALASUNDARAM
Collector of Central Excise, Pune – Appellant
Versus
Lunar Caustic (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Satnam Singh,Gopal Prasad

ORDER

Per V.K. Agrawal :

The Revenue has come in appeal against the order dated 30.8.93 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) holding that the product Winall Glue is classifiable under heading 35.06 and not under sub heading 3905.20 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act and the products, namely, Sensitizer Winall, Sensitizer (G&W) and stencil remover are not dutiable.

2. We heard Shri Satnam Singh, Ld. S.D.R. and Shri Gopal Prasad, Ld. Advocate. We have considered their submissions in respect of each products and the decision is as under:

3.1. In respect of product Winall glue, Commissioner (Appeals) has classified it under heading 35.06 since the said heading expressly covers prepared glue, it is more specific to heading 3905.20 as a polymers of vinyl. The Ld. S.D.R. submitted that the impugned product is a solution of Poly vinyl Alcohol (PVA) and is used as a prepared adhesive in sugar and paper industry; that the product coating solution which is also a solution of Poly Vinyl Alcohol has been classified by the Collector (Appeals) under sub heading 3905.20; that the product "Winall Glue" is not much different from "Coating solution" and should be classified under heading 39

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top