SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.K.BHATNAGAR, P.C.JAIN, V.K.AGRAWAL, JYOTI BALASUNDARAM
Poddar Tyres (P. ) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V. Sridharan,A.K. Agarwal

ORDER

Per Jyoti Balasundaram :

The above appeals arise out of the order dated 26th March, 1990 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh confirming a demand of Central Excise duty of Rs. 4,70,400/- on 16,000 tyres manufactured by the appellants during the period 10.5.88 to 16.6.88 on the ground that they were tyres of a kind used in two-wheeled vehicles viz. Mopeds classifiable under Heading 4011.30 attracting duty at the rate of Rs. 28/- per tyre and not cycle tyres of a kind used in cycles as claimed by the appellants and claimed to be falling under heading 4011.20 attracting nil rate of duty, imposing a penalty of Rs. 1,50,000/- on M/s. Poddar Tyres Pvt. Ltd. and penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on various branches of Poddar Sales Corporation. The Adjudicating authority has also confiscated tyres from various depots with option to redeem the same with varying fines.

2. We have heard Shri V. Sridharan, learned Counsel for the appellants and Shri A.K. Agarwal, learned DR for the Revenue and our findings are recorded as under:-

On 22.6.88, the Central Excise Staff of Ludhiana, visited the factory premises of M/s. Poddar Tyres Pvt. Ltd., who are engaged in the manufacture o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top