SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.L.PEERAN, V.K.AGRAWAL
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Habibullah Badsha, C. Manishankar,S. Kannan

wORDER

Per V.K. Ashtana :

These appeals are against four Orders-in-Appeal Nos. 47/95 dated 17.8.95 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and 6/98,7/98 and 8/98 all dated 23.1.98 also passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), which had considered Order-in-Original No. 6/95 dated 22.2.95 and Orders-in-Original No. 10/96 etc. dated 5.11.96 respectively.

2. The Order-in-OriginalNo. 6/95 (supra) finalised the provisional assessments on the following products manufactured by the appellants and cleared for captive consumption :-

(a) Naphtha

(b) LSHS;

(c) Fuel Oil; and

(d) Refinery Gases

The appellants had claimed Central Excise duty exemption under Notification No. 217/86 dated 2.4.86 as amended by Notification No. 61/94 dated 1.3.94 which had also introduced exemption to goods falling under Chapter 27 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 with effect from 1.3.94. The said order also deals with exemption claimed for Naphtha removed for flushing the pipelines and for which duty exemption was claimed under the same Notification.

3. The Order-in-Appeal No. 47/95 impugned deals with the classification dispute i.e. availability or otherwise of the duty exemption noted above, while the Orders-in-Appeal Nos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top