SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.C.JAIN, ARCHANA WADHWA
National Aluminium Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bhubaneswar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.C. Mohanty,T. Prem Kumar

ORDER

Per Shri P.C. Jain :

Following are the relevant facts :-

1. The appellant, a Govt. of India Undertaking, is having two units - one at Damanjodi and another at Angul. In Damanjodi unit, it manufactures Calcined Alumina falling under Chapter 28 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, out of duty paid inputs on which modvat credit has been taken and at Angul unit it manufactures Aluminium metal falling under Chapter 76 ibid out of calcined alumina manufactured at, and dispatched from, Damanjodi.

2. During the material period 20.4.1989 to 24.7.1989, the appellant dispatched calcined alumina without payment of duty following the Chapter X procedure of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 in terms of Notification No. 217/86 dated 3.4.86 ( as amended). Modvat credit of duty paid on inputs for manufacture of Alumina (which in turn was utilised in manufacture of aluminium metal cleared on payment of duty) was not debited. Instead, the modvat credit earned at Damanjodi was utilised towards payment of duty on aluminium metal manufactured at Angul. Literally speaking, this meant transfer of modvat credit from Damanjodi unit to Angul unit.

3. By a notice dated 18.9.89, the appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top