SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.C.JAIN, ARCHANA WADHWA
Sree Biswa Vijaya Industries – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bhubanewsar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.C. Mitra,S.N. Ghosh

ORDER

Per Shri Jain :

The appellant company herein undertook crushing to tobacco leaves, stems, stalks and butts and they convert them into powder form. Question involved in this appeal is whether the tobacco powder so obtained as mentioned above is liable to duty or not under Chapter 24 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellants' contention is that it falls under 2401.00 as unmanufactured tobacco which carries the nil rate of duty whereas the contention of the lower authorities is that it falls under Tariff Heading 2404.90. In order to appreciate the contention of both sides, we reproduce the relevant Tariff Headings:-

 "24.012401.00Unmanufactured tobacco; tobacco refuseNilNil" 
 24.04' "Other manufactured tobacco and manufactured tobacco substitutes; homogenised or 'Reconstituted' tobacco' tobacco extracts and essences.   
   ................
   ................
  2404.90Other 15%" 

2. We also reproduce below the definition of manufacture given in Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as also the specific definition in relation to tobacco, as mentioned in the Judgment reported in 1990 (48) ELT - 115 at para 1'2:-

"12. The relevant portion of amended Section 2(f) of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top