SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C.N.B.NAIR, P.G.CHACKO
T. D. T. Copper Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Customs, New Delhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Parthasarathy,Sanjeev Srivastava

ORDER

Per P.G. Chacko :

The appellants, in the year 1994, entered into an agreement with M/s. Southwire Company, USA for purchase of machinery and equipments (hereinafter referred to as the capital goods) for manufacture of electrolytic copper rods and, accordingly, imported the capital goods in 1995. They had already entered into a Technical Assistance Agreement on 18.09.1993 with M/s. Taihan Electric Wire Co. Ltd., Korea. The various items of the capital goods were covered by invoices Nos. 1599-A and 1599-B issued by the foreign suppliers. An amount of US $ 15 lakhs was charged on the appellants by M/s. Southwire Company towards "engineering and service charges" as per invoice No. 1599-C. The imported capital goods were intended for use for a process of manufacture termed "SCR-2000 copper system". As per the contract between the appellants and M/s. Southwire Company, the latter would provide engineering services (Item-P under agreement dated 11.01.1994), operational training in USA (Item-Q), user licence (Item-R) and field services and start-up assistance (Item-U). These items were covered by "engineering and service charges" mentioned in invoice No. 1599-C ibid and the amount paya

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top