SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LAJJA RAM, A.C.C.UNNI
Collector of Central Excise, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Bombay Oil Ind. (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M. Jayaraman

ORDER

Per Lajja Ram :

In this appeal filed by the Revenue, the matter relates to the eligibility of Nickel Catalyst and Nickel Aluminium Alloy Powder falling under T.I. 68 for the benefit of Notification No. 201/79 as amended when used for the manufacture of Stearic Acid also falling under T.I. 68. The Asstt. Collector, Central Excise had rejected the claim of the respondent on the ground that they were neither raw materials nor component parts of the finished excisable products and thus, were not eligible for the benefit of set-off under Notification No. 201/79-CE as amended by Notification No. 105/82. The Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay, however, observed that the inputs were not necessarily to form part of the finished product and that raw material need not find place in the final products. He set aside the order passed by the Asstt. Collector, Bombay and allowed the appeal of M/s. Bombay Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd.

2. When the matter was called, none appeared on behalf of the party. A notice of today's hearing had been issued to them on 9.9.96. There is no response. There is no request for any adjournment. As the matter is very old, we are proceeding to deal with the ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top