SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.C.JAIN, S.L.PEERAN
NTTF Electronics Training Centre – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N. Venkataraman,B.K. Singh

ORDER

Per S.L. Peeran : In this stay petition, the appellants are seeking waiver of pre-deposit of Rs. 20,21.383.77 and penalty of Rs. 1.5 lakhs and stay of its recovery during the pendency of this appeal. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant M/s. NTTF Electronic Training Centre issued a show-cause notice dt. 14.8.91. In this show-cause notice, it is alleged that the appellant is a manufacturer of subassembly falling under heading 84.70, 84.71 and 84.73 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 for M/s. Bharath Electronics Ltd., Bangalore and they had contravened Rules 9(1), 52 A, 53 read with Rule 226, 173B, 173C, 173G of Central Excise Rules, 1944 and further committed the offences specified in Rules 173Q etc. in as much as, they had suppressed the facts of manufacture and clearance of the said goods to M/s. Bharath Electronics Ltd., Bangalore without following Central Excise procedures and without payment of Central Excise duty, in contravention of the said rules, with an intention to evade payment of Central Excise duty.

2. We have heard Shri N. Venkataraman, Id. Advocate for the appellant and Shri B.K. Singh, Id. SDR for the Revenue.

3. Ld. Advocate submitted that the Elec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top