SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.KALYANAM, K.SANKARARAMAN
Kerala Electric Lamp Works – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Cochin – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.M. Mammen,Murugandi

ORDER

Per K. SANKARARAMAN: The appeal by M/s. Kerala Electric Lamp Works challenges the order in appeal passed by Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Cochin upholding the finding by Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Ernakulam-I division that Modvat credit was not admissible to them in respect of silican glass crucibles used by them in the manufacture of fluorescent tube for sintering of 'phosphor mix'. The Assistant Collector has held in his order that the subject crucibles were in the nature of equipment, apparatus or appliances used for producing the goods. On appeal by them, the Collector (Appeals) had considered their contentions and the decision cited by them in support of their submissions but distinguished the same from the question before him and held that the crucibles do not have a direct nexus with the final product, fluorescent powder. He observed that the function of the crucible is limited to act as a heating medium and it plays no direct part in the emergence of the final product. He held that, as admitted by the Appellants, the crucible is a sintering medium and is used for bringing about a change in the raw materials and therefore it clearly falls within the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top