SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

U.L.BHAT, K.SANKARARAMAN
Eureka Forbes Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise, Meerut – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.B. Shroff, H.C. Daruwala, Y.R. Godrej,A.K. Singhal

ORDER

Per K. Sankararaman: These appeals involve a common issue and were heard together. This combined order is passed disposing of both the appeals.

2. The appellants manufacture vacuum cleaners. They clear these on payment of duty, to their depots from where they effect their sales. They had declared three items, Hose Pipe, Swivel Brush and Extension Tubes as standard accessories which are cleared from the factory with the vacuum cleaners and included their price in the assessable value of the vacuum cleaners. The department noticed that the appellants were selling their product with a number of other attachments which were described as optional accessories and that the price of these optional accessories was not included in the assessable value declared by them in their price lists. Two show cause notices were issued to them on 2.3.93 and 2.11.93 alleging evasion of Central Excise duty of Rs. 7,31,700/— and Rs. 19,57,677.90 for the periods August 92 to January 93 and February 90 to July 92 respectively. The cases were adjudicated by the Collector of Central Excise, Meerut confirming the duty demands and imposing penalties of Rs. 10 lakhs and Rs.2 lakhs under orders dated 16.12.93

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top