SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.S.SINGHVI
Global Tax Free Traders – Appellant
Versus
William Grant & Sons Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rohit Sharma,A.N. Haksar, Udayan Jain, Namita Chadha, Priyanka Sengar, Sakshi Narula

ORDER

1. Having enjoyed the benefits flowing from the agreements entered with Respondent Nos.1 to 3 appointing it as exclusive importer and distributor of their products and finding that they will not extend the term of appointment beyond 31.03.2013, the appellant filed information under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, 'the Act') alleging abuse of dominant position by Respondent Nos.1 to 3, but could not convince the Competition Commission of India (for short, 'the Commission) to order an investigation into the alleged violation of Section 4(2)(a)(ii) of the Act and to restrain them from selling their products in the Indian market and also pay compensation/costs to the tune of 23,72,297.30 pounds, the appellant has filed this appeal under Section 53B of the Act.

2. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 belong to William Grant & Sons group of companies. They are engaged in the production, sale, marketing and distribution of various kinds of spirits including single malt whisky throughout the world. On 16.11.2005, Respondent Nos.3 appointed the appellant as authorized importer and distributor in India except the States of Maharashtra, Goa and Karnataka in respect of the follo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top