SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

H.C.GUPTA, GEETA GOURI, ANURAG GOEL, M.L.TAYAL, S.N.DHINGRA, ASHOK CHAWLA
Kuldeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
PAL Infrastructure and Developers (P. ) Ltd. – Respondent


ORDER

Order under section 26(2) of Competition Act, 2002

1. The OP launched a residential flat complex, named, 'Pal Aqua Polis' in sector 70-A, Gurgaon, Haryana. The informant booked a residential flat in the said project on 31-03-2007 by depositing Rs. 3,50,000/-. The informant alleged that the OP abused its dominant position by imposing unfair and one sided conditions on the informant through agreement entered between them.

2. As per information, on 26.09.2008, the OP allotted a flat to the informant in Block B with super area 1304 sq. ft. Later, the OP changed project layout plan& in new layout plan block D replaced Block B. To retain flat on similar location, the informant requested a change in allotment and flat D - 102 was allotted to him on 25.04.2011. On 01.10.2011, the builder suggested the informant to apply for allotment of flat in block E, due to non-availability of earlier allotted flat D - 102. The informant was suggested to accept a larger size flat. With no other choice informant acted as advised and a new flat E - 301 with super area 1690 sq. ft was allotted on 01.10.2011. Since super area of new allotted flat was 386 Sq. Ft., more than that of previously allotted fla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top